How Quaint. How Naive. How 'Commercial'. How.....'Civilian'.
(H/T Instapundit)
A 'space entrepenuer' and 'Anglophile' James C. Bennett, (with whom I doubt I would find too many disagreements with based upon his writings) steps WAY out of his area of expertise in a new piece at New Atlantis titled "Proposing a ‘Coast Guard’ for Space" where he 'surprise!' promotes his rationale for a Space 'Coast Guard' of sorts. I note that his central reference, what he (not me) describes as: " a thoughtful article published in the Aerospace Power Journal in 2000" in which a "USAF Lt. Col. Cynthia A. S. McKinley proposed the creation of a Space Guard on the Coast Guard model", commits many of the sins of predecessors in that the superficial 'roles and missions' point of view is used.
Needless to say I prefer another paradigm as a more rational approach to any perceived 'space force' needs.
I would welcome any civil discussion on the strengths and weaknesses of the options as presented.
Commentary and discussion on world events from the perspective that all goings-on can be related to one of the six elements of National Power: Military, Economic, Cultural, Demographic, Organizational, & Geographical. All Elements are interrelated and rarely can one be discussed without also discussing its impact on the others
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
3 comments:
Older posts are moderated only to keep the spambots and time wastrels away. If you are not a spambot or a wastrel, your comment will be posted. Egregious behavior and abusive comments will be initially critiqued. Persistence in egregious behavior and abusive comments will be cut off as deterrence to time wastrels.
Added 28 Sep 13: Comments without specific reference to subject posts that contain links to commercial enterprises also unrelated to subject post will be summarily deleted and reported as SPAM
Speaking generally, the terminology of a "coast guard" evokes the image of a force or agency that is protecting a global commons for everybody. That seems like dangerous thinking to me. Strategic warfare always seems to seek the highest ground it can, be that air, space, or whatever comes after. Painting that high ground as a mutual commons for the whole planet injects the uncertainty and discourse of the international system into the equation.
ReplyDeleteSpace should remain a fiercely guarded national asset, managed by the assorted space agencies and defended by the military. Space will be contested enough in this century. There's no reason to start on a weak footing.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAgreed. In the Bennett piece, he zips right past the distinction between law enforcment and national security. When I first read the article I wondered if it was written by a lawyer, since the ideas proposed reek of 'lawfare'. This is not to say there might not be a reason for a Space Guard for the purposes of preventing smuggling, protection of asteroid belt mining claims, space rescue, space navigation aid management and repair or Heaven knows what else law enforcemen needs the future might hold. (most egregious typos corrected)
ReplyDelete